Search results

Sounds like media are being prepped by a club interested in him. No more reason this week to think he is leaving than last, so someone is running with these stories for some reason.

And so it begins, again.

Sunday nights alright for fighting

Read that. Lunacy. 'Cool guys just have him. You're a little, bankrupt club, you deserve a break'.

Yeah I think I agree. I suspect there was some meeting in the middle.

Guess we won't ever know. But, in Fati's case we are paying huge wages that massively shatter our wage structure (although I accept it's slightly different as it's essentially a loan fee) and Dahoud doesn't necessarily fit the usual signing in terms of age etc (although here I accept and believe...

Because most teams are run by clowns I guess. These owners are like politicians filp flipping on the whims of focus groups. They love the hype. Emery is a great example of the opposite in effect. He's just not a fashionable guy. Football hipsters won't be making videos about him. It's all about...

Is it blaming the manager or is it calling him out when he is blaming everybody else?

Chelsea backed Poch. They paid 100 million for Caicedo and look at them.

Webster was excellent. We got decent value from him.

I wonder what being backed actually means. What/who did he want? I'd love to know.

Why keep saying it though? Comes across a bit spoilt.

I'm sure there's a lot of managers, some who've had way more actual success than RDZ, who'll be looking at our club, the set up, our board and our players (even with the injuries) thinking 'i'd have some of that'. I love RDZ but diplomacy definitely isn't one of his strong points.