Search results

Calling @Dr. No

Pity that despite wanting more younger representation, the shortlist actually has a higher % of over 55s than applied.............

I don’t know any more than what the above says :shrug:

Agree……also surprised 23 is seen as ‘encouraging’ given our STH/A+ membership base.

He left because of 'bullying' (basically people calling him out for posting a photo of a sign that said 'no photos') :lol:

Does FAB have an NDP ? :laugh:

Email is out re seeking new members YOU WANT TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE FAN ADVISORY BOARD? Hi The Fan Advisory Board are looking for up to five new members to join the current team in providing feedback to the club on various topics. If you're interested in applying and helping shape...

Thanks. Why was the meeting with the club 'disappointing' ?

The one I got back from Athens pretty much was……including Sir Tony, FBS, Johnny and Warren, @Lenny Rider and goodness how many others in colours :laugh:

….at significant cost, and for the benefit of a lucky and affluent 200 or so (how many loyalty points needed to bag a seat ?? 🤣)

The club will be massively up against a very short timetable as it is...... won't have the time to engage in more discussion.

Bring back beer trollies

Agree with this

Zero chance any FAB (rightly) would get anything from a PBOBE-type on that other than ‘sorry that’s outside your remit, confidential club business’.

I don’t have anything to protest or complain about……… :shrug:

Think it’s more recognition that they are on a hiding to nothing - there’s no platform

....or, there's genuinely not that much for the FAB to get exercised about because the club get the vast majority of things right in the first place (and those that still rankle - like transport - aren't going to be affected by a few fan reps talking about it).

So, basically nothing much at all that impacts the average fan. Paras 1-4, doing business with yourselves - FAB admin Para 5, club will do what they think is best but you chatted about it Para 6, see 1-4 Para 7 - the draw was public anyway Sorry but cynicism reinforced :shrug:

Pretty much agree but not sure it’s taking the piss, more just a genuine belief (rightly or wrongly) that it’s unnecessary but had to be done to fall into line with regulatory expectations. I can see why the club hold that view - personally not sure we need it. Like others I feel for the members...

Not sure why they should - we were ‘collateral damage’.