I’m going to make an educated guess, based on the evidence thus far, that whatever you or your friend got banned most, if not all, will consider twattish and deserved of a ban.
The club is entitled to protect its brand and those associated with the brand. That’s pretty much standard business practice isn’t it? I agree what constitutes bringing the club into disrepute, I amusingly recall the actual language is besmirch, is a matter of opinion but all the cases I have...
You seem to have ignored the preceding caveat i.e. within the laws of the land.
A lot of businesses have terms and conditions should you choose to engage with them. Next time you buy a gig ticket, book certain restaurants, use the gym have a look.
I’ll ask again, what did you (or a friend) do?
First of all my “no one is guilty” comment wasn’t clear. What I mean is that people always swear blind they’re not guilty, or have extenuating circumstances etc. This was almost always the case with away tickets but under investigation it shows they broke very clear rules.
You seem very...
From memory there’s been punishments for abuse, lobbing things, fighting and running on the pitch. I presume we agree the bans for these were fair.
The most contention arises with the bans for passing on away tickets; these usually get a 5 or 10 game ban which seems fair to me. I know all the...
I disagree with this. It’s this exact argument which has partially led to the increase in anti-social behavior at and around games. Whilst acting a twat might not be illegal within the parameters of the law, and eradication might be driven more by club agenda, the club are well within their...