Search results

My take on this sort of agrees with your synopsis but in reverse. By that I mean - I actually thought his involvement was holding Graham Potter back. Ashworth got very involved in the day to day running of the team after CH left. I always thought, so much so that it pulled the strings too...

Can't decide whether to play the ''Good'' Cop or ''Bad'' Cop :)

I am using the terminology in a legal term from my Legal Training ( from memory as it was many years ago and I am sure they are so old that they are obsolete, given my age and when I studied ) - But the terminology was taught to me back then as being '' a weighing up of the evidence ''

You are right about the definition ''body of evidence'' - but when reviewing a body of evidence much like on a set of scales to see which side of the scales it ''weights'' on to establish which is greater - '' Proponderance'' meaning ''the greater quantity''

Proponderance of Evidence I used means that there is s more evidence than not that he may want to speak to them

Can we invoice you for the therapy session ?

I suppose I am technically. However under the " Propenderance of Evidence " threshold he is most likely Guilty as Charged :)

Doesn't usually make the Press if the individuals themselves don't show an interest in speaking to the party enquiring - Rejections are normally done behind the scenes if that is the situation. Although I would imagine there are probably the odd exceptions to that situation

Yeh - If he is a on a '' Rolling Contract '' the ''Compromise Agreement'' will most likely be to pay that up - So probably a Years Salary if its a one year rolling Contract or 2 years if it is a 2 years Rolling Contract

For someone like him who is obviously a very clever bloke and has a wealth of knowledge on so many things and is a ''Master of the Analogy'' and very funny sometimes - He can also be as thick as shiite occasionally

Now I repeat - What the F#ck has this got to do with this got to do with the Lewis Dunk discussion ? You really are putting this Board in Legal jeopardy by referring to someone as a ''Drug Dealer'' and then backing it up with '' the judge came to the conclusion that there was no evidence...

I don't think all the improved Contracts within 12 to 14 months of each other were given to Lewis for no reason

What the F#ck you on about ? - What has this conversation about Lewis Dunk got to do with that ? Explain yourself and I would be more than happy to pass your comments on the ''the Greeks'' Lawyers

I have already stated that I am not so sure that the Club would sell - Thats not the same as Dunk not being interested

Thats a new one on me that he wasn't keen on the Fulham offer

West Brom came in as well, after Fulham, I think the year after Fulham

I don't say that for sure the club would let him go. But I do say that Lewis himself would if the money was right. I know what his attitude in the past has been when other clubs have come in for him.

Lewis Dunk would 100% go for the right money

These Clubs might have 4 different players that they are targeting for a certain position. All it would take is for someone to say. Forget those other three and go all in and pay what Brighton would want for Dunk because they think he could potentially keep them up

Because he might say " yes pay them what they are asking because signing Dunk might be the difference between staying up and not staying up."