so when exposing rodents to radiation of 5W/kg or 10W/kg they find "equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity" in some of the groups, which in the detail is about 1 or 2 incidents in 114 (including control). you should have a look through the papers, 90 pages of setup, tables, 2 years study...
appreciate the effort. i picked three, one said they think they found some effect of using 3G device to heart rate, one suggests skin might absorb radiation (but not what this might mean), the other postulates whether 5G breaches legal limits of electromagnetic radiation and find they might...
how about instead of deflecting to tobacco, you provide some of the thousands of studies proving specifically mobile phones are harmful?
it is very easy to trick people, and some are trying to doing again as they did with 4G, 3G, 2G, microwave ovens, overhead cables... (not underground cables...
worse for what? as noted some system use previously used frequncies, and some systems use the same band as wifi. should be copius amounts of evidence of something.
odd article, not entirely sure i believe it (reads like a journalist projecting an argument onto a character). thing is the final conclusion is in agreement with the suggestion that players (and directors too) should take a pay cut for the duration.
presentation, they'll have a pay deferal but not a cut, pleading NHS as defense. its not a good look when millions are taking cuts or outright losing jobs.
think more about those numbers. if Branson owns 51% of VA, at valuation of 1.8bn thats 900m not available of the 3.5bn wealth. and so on, wealth is in assets. which assets and businesses are supposed to be sold to save others?