it certainly intended to avoid redundancies, its formal name is Job Retention Scheme. some business may be justifying this practice as a way to reduce the total number. lose a number under furlough or fold altogether.
im hoping for June with capcity restrictions, 2m line at the bar.
that 2m damn rule is going to be a pain, they need to go 1.5 or 1m for practical observation.
ees complicated. it seems the qualification is your business is going under without the support, staff will all be laid off, so put them on furlough and pick they'll up the 80%. however, what if you can sustain half the business? what if you have substantial debts and bank covenants kick in so...
how does one exclude someone from politics? i also wonder if anyone knows what the payroll is for Wetherspoons and if its possible for them to cover this for a month without revenue. is suspect other orgnisations will be following this path if the process is slow. it turns out its more...